In the context of litigation delay, what is a consequence of failing to take a required step?

In the context of litigation delay, failing to take a required step often leads to a dismissal for want of prosecution. This is a procedural mechanism employed by the court to ensure that cases proceed in a timely manner. If a party does not actively progress their case within a specified timeframe, the court may conclude that the party is not serious about pursuing the matter, which may result in the dismissal of their claim or action.

A dismissal for want of prosecution serves to prevent the court's resources from being tied up by cases that are effectively stagnant. Courts have an inherent interest in maintaining an efficient and orderly process, and allowing too much delay can undermine this goal. This dismissal acts as a means to encourage parties to comply with procedural requirements and deadlines.

In contrast, other consequences, such as dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or requirement for a summary judgment, relate to different aspects of litigation and do not specifically address the situation of failing to take required steps within the confines of litigation timelines. Dissolution of all claims would suggest a more drastic outcome than what is typically aligned with a failure to prosecute. Therefore, dismissal for want of prosecution accurately reflects the scenario presented in the question.